1166

[h1]Not even pixel boobs can fix what is an awful awful game.[/h1] I can't even write a decent review for this game. The art is just awful, the controls are horrible, and the gameplay itself is just annoying and boring. The story is the only thing mildly positive about this but even that is ruined by the glitches (constant loops of speech until you go to a new scene) and typos.

[i] So Bad, It's Good [/i] [b] 1166 [/b] started as the worst game I ever played and somehow managed to be one of the most satisfying experiences by the end. I would describe it as a walking simulator that is built around psychological narrative and intentionally bad game design. There are certain things that a sane developer would never do and yet the developer of 1166 kept on doing it. Even most of the puzzles are presented as game glitches so you might think that game is broken. 1166 seems like a self-aware bad game. I have to credit the developer for having the guts to utilize what most will interpret as unintuitive gameplay. It may seem like a throwaway story until the complexity of the plot hits you like a truck. Despite the simplistic look of the game, there is a surprising amount of purpose to each scene. Story is told through a perspective of 6 different characters.You better pay attention because the all of the dialogue will come in handy. It took me about 2 hours to beat ...

Love the Pixel graphics. The controls are weird, shooting mechanics are bad. Transitions between scenes are sudden and often make no sense. Tons of unintentionally hilarious dialogue. I mean, I enjoyed my time with the game, but I don't think it was what the Developer intended. The game needs a lot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNlpWkWzD60

You can usually tell if a game is going to be successful through the beta test alone. Take for instance this game which seemed to have only 9 testers. Anything less than 50 testers is usually considered a blatant waste of time. Problem is that developers also often groom their testers. In other words the testers are so wanting to please the developer for receiving a free game that they often downplay their true criticism. Either that or developers can be prejudice looking only for target audience that agrees with them, dismissing any gamer that doesn't. In this beta test a few annoyances were constantly being grumbled by the testers... * Hit boxes to the enemies are inconsistent and appalling. * No clear indicators of which direction you should travel. * Ability to walk off screen. * Dialogues keep looping. * Confusing presentation where you don't know who is talking or who is being actually referenced, especially at the end. Were any of these things brought up fixed during the beta ...

This game is very strange. A mixture of both a mystery and a monster game, you will be compelled to keep playing just to find out what is going on. The one criticism I would give is that there should be an indication on who is speaking. A very interesting game that makes you want to know more. https://youtu.be/GCGN5POpk28

⣿⣿⡻⠿⣳⠸⢿⡇⢇⣿⡧⢹⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡐⣯⠁ ⠄⠄ ⠟⣛⣽⡳⠼⠄⠈⣷⡾⣥⣱⠃⠣⣿⣿⣿⣯⣭⠽⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⢢⠏⠄ ⠄ ⢠⡿⠶⣮⣝⣿⠄⠄⠈⡥⢭⣥⠅⢌⣽⣿⣻⢶⣭⡿⠿⠜⢿⣿⣿⡿⠁⠄⠄ ⠄⣼⣧⠤⢌⣭⡇⠄⠄⠄⠭⠭⠭⠯⠴⣚⣉⣛⡢⠭⠵⢶⣾⣦⡍⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄ ⠄⣿⣷⣯⣭⡷⠄⠄⢀⣀⠩⠍⢉⣛⣛⠫⢏⣈⣭⣥⣶⣶⣦⣭⣛⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄ ⢀⣿⣿⣿⡿⠃⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣎⢩⠌⣡⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠄⠄⠄ ⢸⡿⢟⣽⠎⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠄⠄ ⣰⠯⣾⢅⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠄ ⢰⣄⡉⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠄ ⢯⣌⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⢸⣇⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⢸...

i thought this gamed seemed good but it was so bad that i returned it after playing for only 24 minutes

[h2]1166[/h2] Has a total of [b]7[/b] trading cards.