Programming Without Coding Technology 2.0

IMO, this should be marked as BETA. It has a lot of bugs. It's not beginner friendly, either. If you know nothing of programming, you would probably find it hard to follow and learn. It doesn't really have an audience: It's too buggy for professional development, yet too complicated for beginners, IMO. "Programming Without Coding" sounds like a misnomer, too. It's not like SCRATCH, for instance. You can't just build the code like building blocks, per se. You need to understand the semantics of RING to program with it. For instance, you need to know the syntax of conditionals, strings, etc. It says I used it for 12.5 hours, but that's a lie, lol. I left the program open overnight :) I used it for maybe a couple of hours, exploring what it was about, but I keep running into bugs. For example, it will crash out of no where, then you lose all your unsaved code. If I run into it again, I will describe what happened. There are other areas that don't make sense, like you can't move blo...

PWCT is a refreshing entry into the field of easier to use products for conceptualizing an idea into an actual working application. PWCT should be considered an easier transition into the world of understanding what it is to develop an application. With its visual approach to programming it makes the understanding of what is required and how to apply it less of a burden on people who want to create applications. How does it do this? It provides a list of many of the building pieces called components in PWCT that allow you to apply everything from declaring variables to interfacing with files or databases. Does this require you to understand the concepts of developing applications? Yes, it does but the learning curve to gain this knowledge is made easier by PWCT’s visual approach to putting the application together. It closely resembles the idea put forth by Legos the popular toys that provide a way to build anything you can imagine. Although Legos will allow you to build complex bu...

Amazing piece of software especially for the price. I've come across a couple of bugs since purchasing, of which the Dev has fixed the issue within a hour. This is the first time I've seen a Dev that's so focused on the software and the customers. I will add more to this review within the next couple of weeks after I've finished the projects I'm doing in PROGRAMMING WITHOUT CODING, to give you more information.

As someone who knows next to nothing about coding. I'm going into this with a huge belly flop. I'm personally having no luck with it, but I'm still learning, I've noticed a few minor problems with the layout. To me It looks like it has a lot of potential to be something amazing. I just don't think I'm ready yet. I'm giving it a thumbs up for now, cause it seems the creator wants this to work. For now I'm going to sit on it, and let some time grow with it, and then I'll start watching some youtube videos on it to learn more. I believe people will start making some to show it has the potential to be awesome.

I like the concept, but I will not really use it. (And neither refund) It's lacking one simple thing, autocomplete for imported libraries. It could scan the library folder and allow you to pick the library to include. Another thing it could do is provide autocomplete for the included library methods. Those are things that classical IDEs do. I do think it's good for beginners as it ease a bit the learning process by offering less friction for the base components. Maybe the developer can look at MPS, which would allow to do crazy stuff!

Learn basic language but with style and pattern

With a few feature improvements it could be a good clickteam fusion replacement.

Its has many uses. As it grows with time it will become more powerful. Glad I purchased it.

As someone who started with not much knowledge on coding, this helped me a lot. Its very smooth, it has many things to learn, and so much more.

I love it good job keep it up and keep updating God bless y'all ❤️💯